Confluenţe Literare: FrontPage
CONFLUENŢE LITERARE

CONFLUENŢE LITERARE
ISSN 2359-7593
ISSN-L 2359-7593
BUCUREŞTI, ROMÂNIA


AFIŞARE MOBIL

CATALOG DE AUTORI

CĂUTARE ARTICOLE

Cautare Articole


ARHIVĂ EDIŢII

RECOMANDĂ PAGINA

REDACŢIA

CLASAMENT
DE PROZĂ

CLASAMENT
SĂPTĂMÂNAL
DE PROZĂ


Home > Impact > Libertate > Mobil |   


Autor: Marian Nuţu Cârpaci         Publicat în: Ediţia nr. 2093 din 23 septembrie 2016        Toate Articolele Autorului

Gheorghe Sarău is not the father of the Romani language!
 
 
 
 
Distribuie!
 
Distribuie!       Aboneaza-te!
Even mister Gheorghe Sarău did many good things for the Romani language, he cannot be the Father of the Romani language as is stated on his personal page on academia.edu: http://www.academia.edu/6820860/Parintele_limbii_rromani_Interviu_acordat_de_Gheorghe_Sarau_ziaristului_George_Lacatus_in_13_aug._2013_nepublicat_21.04.2014_  
 
The title of the article (an interview) is translated as Gheorghe Sarău is "the FATHER of Romani language."  
 
Such appelation is an insult to God, and an offense to Mother India. Firstly, God created all languages. So, God is the Father of the Romani language, and India is the Mother of Romani language. You mister Sarău learnt our Romani language from native Roma speakers, so you cannot be the FATHER of our language. If the heavenly father of the Romani language is God Himself, the earthly fathers of Romani language are the grandparents of each Romani speaker. You believe that if you had not been existed, our Romani language would die? You are wrong! Our Romani language is ALIVE, and will be ALIVE FOREVER, because we, the Roma speakers, are ALIVE. AME NA SAM MULE- We are not dead!  
 
Your teacher was Marcel Courthiade, and he is not a Rom, he is Gajo, and he killed our language. He is really the killer of the Romani language. The standardization of the Romani language cannot be made by a single man, or by his friends, without a serious comparative study between all Indian languages and all Romani dialects, and then be decided the correct forms. For example, because mister Marcel Courthiade invented the theory of the 3 strata in Romani language, placing the Arli in the first strata, and Kalderasch in the last, he made a serious discrimination! Who is Courthiade to decide which dialect is the first? This is the classification made by Courthiade:  
 
"The first stratum includes the oldest dialects: Mećkari (of Tirana), Kabuʒi (of Korça), Xanduri, Drindari, Erli, Arli, Bugurji, Mahaʒeri (of Pristina), Ursari (Rićhinari), Spoitori (Xoraxane), Karpatichi, Polska Roma, Kaale (from Finland), Sinto-manush, and the so-called Baltic dialects. In the second there are Ćergari (of Podgorica), Gurbeti, Jambashi, Fichiri, Filipiʒi (of Agia Varvara) The third comprises the rest of the so-called Gypsy dialects, including Kalderash, Lovari, Machvano." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romani_language  
 
MISTER MARCEL COURTHIADE DECIDED ONLY ON THE COMPARATION OF 11 DIALECTAL ROMANI WORDS, WHICH DIALECT IS PURER! IS LACKING THE COMPARATION WITH THEIR INDIAN SYNONYMS.  
 
How can he proove that he is right? Where is the bibliography? How Courthiade decided which Romani dialect is closer to the oldest Romani forms? Just because he wants so? Which is the criterion on the basis he knows that the suffix –ipen is superior and older than the suffix –imos? How he knows that the dialects which are using "khoni" and "pani", are more correct that those using "khoi" and "pai"? It would be very useful for mister Courthiade to remind him, that in the Romani language the loss of a sound is very frequent, as in following examples:  
 
Romani>Roma`i, purani>pura`i.  
 
This way can be explained the loss of N from the gypsy word purani. So, after this examples we cannot decide if Kalderasch is the first or the third strata after the definition of Courthiade, because the Kalderasch Roma are using in parallel the forms ROMANI SHIB / ROMA`I SHIB, PURANI JIUVLI/PURA`I JIUVLI. Why mister Courthiade don’t picked my examples to make a classification…? Simply because his wife is a speaker of Arli dialect, and he was interested to impose her dialect.  
 
I am very curious how will be classified the Lovar dialect? Because the Lovar are using –imos and –ipe , and even the Kalderasch are using the –ibe suffix, in "habe"-food…The Lovar are in the first stratum and in the third in the same time? The Kalderasch used in their past the –ipen suffix for all words ending today in –imos. And it is clear that surely was this way, because we say "hamos/haben"-food, but we say today only "pimos"-drink, beverage, but the Lovars are saying "pimos/pibe". Simply the Kalderasch preferred only the suffix –imos. This cannot be a criterion to impose a dialect like Arli. In Romania nobody among the native Romani speakers don’t understand completely the language invented by you, mister Gheorghe Sarău.  
Mister Sarău you are romanian, not a gypsy, and we, the Roma people dont accept a non- Roma . If you believe in God, then dont accept the title Father of the Romani language, as the gypsy reporter Rudy Moca declared that all the Roma accept you as the Father of our language:  
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XXtrvV702I  
 
 
You learnt our language from us, the ALIVE ROMA, mister Gheorghe Sarău. You cannot impose your rules (which are the rules of Courthiade), as long as you have not researched all Indian languages. After a complete researching in at least 30 Indo-Aryan languages (including over 300 dialects), a collective of Romani native speakers can decide which grammar forms and words are correct in every Romani dialect, for a common literary Romani language. Untill this comparative research between Romani and all indian languages is not made, nobody can impose a self-invented form of common Romani.  
 
 
Jai Hind! Hindustan Zindabad! Jai Romani jib! Tum Bharaat hamari mata he! Tu India san amari Dei! Tu Devla san amaro Dad. Na ik Gajo!  
 
Referinţă Bibliografică:
Gheorghe Sarău is not the father of the Romani language! / Marian Nuţu Cârpaci : Confluenţe Literare, ISSN 2359-7593, Ediţia nr. 2093, Anul VI, 23 septembrie 2016, Bucureşti, România.

Drepturi de Autor: Copyright © 2016 Marian Nuţu Cârpaci : Toate Drepturile Rezervate.
Utilizarea integrală sau parţială a articolului publicat este permisă numai cu acordul autorului.

Abonare la articolele scrise de Marian Nuţu Cârpaci
Comentează pagina şi conţinutul ei:

Like-urile, distribuirile și comentariile tale pe Facebook, Google Plus, Linkedin, Pinterest și Disqus se consideră voturi contorizate prin care susții autorii îndrăgiți și promovezi creațiile valoroase din cuprinsul revistei. Îți mulțumim anticipat pentru această importantă contribuție la dezvoltarea publicației. Dacă doreşti să ne semnalezi anumite comentarii, te rugăm să ne trimiți pe adresa de e-mail confluente.ro@gmail.com sesizarea ta.
RECOMANDĂRI EDITORIALE

Publicaţia Confluenţe Literare se bazează pe contribuţia multor autori talentaţi din toate părţile lumii. Sistemul de publicare este prin intermediul conturilor de autor, emise ca urmare a unei evaluări în urma trimiterii unui profil de autor împreună cu mai multe materiale de referinţă sau primirii unei recomandări din partea unui autor existent. Este obligatorie prezentarea identității solicitantului, chiar și în cazul publicării sub pseudonim. Conturile inactive pe o durată mai mare de un an vor fi suspendate, dar vor putea fi din nou activate la cerere.

Responsabilitatea asupra conţinutului articolelor aparţine în întregime autorilor, punctele de vedere sau opiniile nefiind neapărat împărtăşite de către colectivul redacţional. Dacă sunt probleme de natură rasială, etnică sau similar, vă rugăm să ne semnalaţi imediat pentru remediere la adresa de corespondenţă mai jos menţionată. Articolele care vor fi contestate prin e-mail de către persoanele implicate prin subiectul lor vor fi retrase în timpul cel mai scurt de pe site.


E-mail: confluente.ro@gmail.com

Fondatori: Octavian Lupu şi George Roca

Consultaţi Catalogul autorilor pentru o listă completă a autorilor.
 
ABONARE LA EDIŢIA
ZILNICĂ


ABONARE LA EDIŢIA
SĂPTĂMÂNALĂ


ABONARE LA EDIŢIA
DE AUTOR



FLUX DE ARTICOLE AUTOR

 
 
CLASAMENT
DE POEZIE

CLASAMENT
SĂPTĂMÂNAL
DE POEZIE
 
VALIDARE DE PAGINĂ
 
Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional
 
CSS valid!